README Generator
Create polished project READMEs in seconds
gpt-4o-mini
Your prompt will appear here…
Your beautifully formatted article will appear here once you generate.
No history yet
Your generations will appear here. Sign in to save them permanently.
When did you last land on a repository, scroll the README, and still not know what the project does? Or open your own and find install steps for a version you dropped a year ago? README Generator writes the front page of your project from a description of it, in the order a newcomer actually reads.
Short answer: README Generator produces a complete project README from a short description of your codebase, with the sections readers expect: what it does, how to install it, how to use it, and how to contribute.
What is README Generator?
README Generator is a free tool that writes project documentation from notes. You describe the project, its stack, how it is installed and what it is for. It returns the README in markdown, with headed sections and code fences where commands belong. It suits a new repository, an internal service nobody documented, or a side project you want people to try.
How Does README Generator Work?
The prompt box accepts your diff, changes or notes, and for a README the useful input is a description rather than code.
- Describe the project: what it does, the language, how it runs, who it is for.
- Set Output Type to README so the same panel writes documentation rather than a commit message.
- Choose Length, then generate and read the draft in the output card.
- Copy the markdown, or download it as TXT and drop it into the repository.
| Option | What it changes | Suggested value |
|---|---|---|
| Output Type | Which artefact the notes become | README |
| Tone / Detail | How formal and how explanatory the prose is | Standard for an open project, Professional for an internal one |
| Length | Short, Normal or Detailed | Detailed for a library, Short for a small utility |
| Include Sections | Whether headed blocks appear at all | On, always, for a README |
The Sections A README Needs
A first time reader answers four questions in about thirty seconds: what is this, does it fit my problem, how do I run it, and is it maintained. The generated draft covers them in that order, and the extras follow underneath.
- ✅ A one line description above everything else
- ✅ Install and quick start commands in a code block
- ✅ A short usage example with real values, not placeholders
- ✅ Configuration, contributing notes and a licence line
When It Is Worth Running
Good moments
- A repository that has never had a README
- An internal service handed to a new team
- Before you make a project public
- After a rewrite makes the old instructions wrong
Less useful for
- API reference pages generated from source
- Architecture documents that need diagrams
- Anything requiring exact version numbers you have not supplied
Fix These Before You Push
Important Run every command in the draft before you commit it. Install steps are written from your description, so a package name or a flag can be plausible and still wrong.
Then check the small things that age badly: version numbers, a licence that matches the file in the repository, and links to pages that exist. Delete any section the project does not have, because an empty Contributing heading reads worse than no heading. A README with four accurate sections beats one with twelve half filled ones.
Writing documentation on EizTools needs no account and costs nothing, and the model selector lets you regenerate the same notes through a different engine when the prose feels flat. README Generator sits alongside the rest of the developer tooling in the coding tools category, each tool with options built for its own job.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does it return markdown?
Yes. The draft comes back with markdown headings, lists and fenced code blocks, so it renders correctly the moment you paste it into README.md.
Can it add badges?
Ask for them in the prompt or in Custom Instructions. Check each badge URL afterwards, since a badge pointing at the wrong repository is worse than none.
How much detail should I give it?
Name the language, the install command, one usage example and the intended user. Those four facts carry most of the quality of the finished README.
Will it document my code by reading it?
Not from the repository itself. It writes from what you paste, so a short accurate description produces a better README than a large dump of source.
A README is the only documentation most people will ever read, and it is usually written last by whoever has the least time. Getting a structured draft out of a two minute description removes that excuse, and leaves you doing the part only you can do: checking that the commands actually run.